Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 8270 Final resting place ??

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 8270 Final resting place ??
From: Laurence KL7 L <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 13:35:42 -0900
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <6E7ABFEC60D644ABAADC70A71342CE06@White>
References: <5389007EB2DA43F3B37E3CEB7069364B@AGB> <6E7ABFEC60D644ABAADC70A71342CE06@White>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Qrm wise its the same up here and about 4db worse than 8970during daytime from various local generators and fenceless dog fence qrm...
Laurence KL7L


On Jan 22, 2014, at 12:56 PM, "Markus Vester" <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Graham,
 
not sure whether there is currently anything near "final" in that matter. It's more of an ad-hoc thing: a few of grabbers have been set around that frequency, and a couple of stations have made low-power transmissions. For me, 8270 is not really optimal because it's close to 8267.7 with a lot of 16.67 Hz related QRM, certainly worse than good old 8970 was. We'll also want to find out what sort of QRM future receivers eg in America will have to deal with.
 
So my suggestion is yes, stay around there for the time being, but be prepared to move somewhere else if that will turn out better. It surely wouldn't be a good idea to ask José Ros to hardcode it into his software ;-)
 
All the best,
Markus (DF6NM)

 
From: Graham
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:20 PM
Subject: LF: 8270 Final resting place ??

8270  Final  resting  place ??
 
All -   Is  8270Hz   the  final  resting  place  for  audio-band   experiments ? , is this   qrg  suitable   WW ?
 
Tnx -Graham
G0NBD
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>