To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: RE: SAQ December 24th, 2013 received in Milano - Italy |
From: | "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Dec 2013 16:04:06 +0100 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
In-reply-to: | <0DC530C0030F483195ECA59F36CD03A4@Clemens0811> |
References: | <[email protected]> <0DC530C0030F483195ECA59F36CD03A4@Clemens0811> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32) |
Hello Clemens, SAQ was the best I have heard it so far.The signal was 20 dB stronger than the noise in a 500 Hz bandwidth as far as I could measure it in regard to the ongoing static. In fact it was still easy copy when I opened up the bandwidth to 5 kHz! Heard on a PERSEUS SDR and a pa0rdt-Mini-Whip antenna 5 meter up.I also found that the PERSEUS NBV noise blanker completely removed all static. They tested yesterday morning and as static was completely absent, reception was even better. 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: RE: SAQ December 24th, 2013 received in Milano - Italy, Claudio Pozzi |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: 23-24 Dec Best QRB/reports, Alex R7NT |
Previous by Thread: | RE: LF: RE: SAQ December 24th, 2013 received in Milano - Italy, Clemens Paul |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: SAQ December 24th, 2013 received in Milano - Italy, Claudio Pozzi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |