To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 74.5493 instead...(1of2) |
From: | Markus Vester <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:28:16 -0400 (EDT) |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=pass [email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1382455696; bh=kRx499z8E52xouvy8vf7C3yZsyffq5xrCCvG9y81/OI=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i67aTyTou8IrQkuUZS/q5YduvzuGIzgfyHsaIenJApZt2/JykBPFPzxLuPXgPa1sq n1cqjo+NL30ST7nR7h/hngYh58p1ezc1gWIVeoT5cvvRmxHbXs22eHS/L7+A3lbfdL UI1AdypwUAGiBFSbGAbuODmv6MG0eEb7Io9/chng= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Dex,
antennas are getting on in years, and so are we ;-) The one good thing about tree supports is that they grow taller with age: The pine tree supporting my southern top load leg has grown from 6 to 11 meters since I first attached a string in 1999.
Recently one of my neighbours has given hints about shading and possible pruning, which I hope to be able to divert for a while.
Regarding ERP on 74 kHz: For a voltage limited E-field antenna, at half frequency you have to reduce input power until you have halved the current. In conjunction with the quarter radiation resistance, ERP would go down by a factor of 16! At VLF this is very severe: My small Marconi antenna, which can barely radiate 1 W ERP at 136 kHz, drops to 10 microwatts at 9 kHz. A similar same scaling also applies to loops driven at constant current.
In addition, at lower frequencies trees around an E-field antenna shunt a larger portion of the displacement current to ground, due to the ratio of capacitive versus ohmic impedances. From my experience, this degradation disappears only during deep frost when trunks apparently become completely dry.
Still hope to catch your 74 kHz beacon one of these days. However I suspect that the DCF77 noise may not be completely neglegible here, even between 1 Hz maxima. This might explain some of the perceived reception deficits in Germany, versus England and Holland.
Best wishes,
Markus (DF6NM) -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mo, 21 Okt 2013 10:52 pm Betreff: Re: LF: 74.5493 instead...(1of2) I've been running /5 from sundown to sunup. 200 watts leaving the |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Conditions, Laurence KL7 L |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): 74.549.6, Bob Raide |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Conditions, Laurence KL7 L |
Next by Thread: | LF: 74.5495 last night, Mike Dennison |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |