Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: RE: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): 74.549.6

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: RE: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): 74.549.6
From: "hvanesce" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:00:49 -0500
Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail (test mode) [email protected]
Delivered-to: [email protected]
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1382461280; bh=4XykAqgYmyGloZu3sdGxFz7fw56vh5A1nDpLGawdgwk=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=fnaXn2gGtLrB58Xrzi6XxCdshpwTKpC5diGwQrZq0gtaR9MKBWRB2Focgb5fM33TM sO4qXgDlZ+DFx5ZaPIM57o3BbrQNxaHQ+J62kwu4jlIJASk9Ah6C0gj4NzPp5clt3g sIc5iyxidORxh+ku9OCg43TB/1Qks+tP6vBeAIv/fylH5Aqo02OXwEzmR4lWkcxtEP Lw7xbR3zYEpf30wAc7b1FydB5MU0LvUEYwBD0CcphzfLvzyGwE8T5V3MyDNJOuCeGb CcezXNA2xGj42BGwHn5Xm6uqHYf8xTTUYJHVl844WAcQm5uTG1ZTw9PJklIouHkzhP nYN/XSTKNnsqw==
In-reply-to: <001f01cecef6$fe088150$0802a8c0@acer>
References: <001f01cecef6$fe088150$0802a8c0@acer>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQI/HIVbT4oMvD3r8DYWnbobnp2h45kgV1YQ

Henny,

                                                                                                                                             

Another nice capture! (22-10-2013, attached). Is your time stamp of 5:21:54 in UTC, or local time? Is 5:21:54 on the right edge of the image?

 

To answer the above question, I tried to use your capture from 17-10-2013 (also attached) as a reference (it has a time stamp of 07:36:59), because Bob tended to switch off around 0600 UTC, but Bob’s switch-off seemed to line up with 0700 on your image, which I believe is not your local time at 0600 UTC.

 

I tried to line up characters between your grabber, and Mike’s and Hartmut’s grabbers, but my guesses gave offsets of tens of minutes in the characters. Does the time stamp (5:21:54, 07:36:59) line up with a part of the screen slightly to the left of the right edge, perhaps?

 

The reason that I’m asking is that on Sunday night, the differences between WG2XRS/4 and WG2XRS/5 signals on your grabber and Mike’s and Hartmut’s grabbers showed very interesting propagation differences. I thought that the group might be interested in seeing this graphically. Yesterday I prepared a Mathcad plot for the group, showing estimated signal strength (normalized) over time, for XRS/4 and XRS/5 signals on your grabber and Mike’s and Hartmut’s grabbers, and I am ready to distribute the plot, but I would like to line up the plots on the time scale before I distribute to you and Bob, Mike, Hartmut, Joe and the group. There is something particularly interesting about propagation on Sunday that is easiest to show with a plot of all the RX results for both TX signals.

 

Thanks for all of the great grabber plots!

 

Apologies, I removed the attachments because this message did not go through with attachments; I will send them separately (the attachments are from Henny’s messages on 22-10-2013 and 17-10-2013).

 

73,

 

Jim AA5BW

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of henny
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 2:19 AM
To: blacksheep
Subject: LF: E-mail met bijlage (attachment): 74.549.6

 

Gm Bob.

the capture

henny cpm

73

Het bericht kan nu met het volgende bijlagen of koppelingen worden verzonden:
74.549.6

Opmerking: Sommige e-mailprogramma's staan ter beveiliging tegen virussen het verzenden of ontvangen van bepaalde bestandsbijlagen niet toe. Controleer de beveiligingsinstellingen voor uw e-mail als u wilt weten hoe bijlagen worden afgehandeld.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>