LF: Say HI to Juno (or VK on LF)?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	LF: Say HI to Juno (or VK on LF)?
From:	Dimitrios Tsifakis <[email protected]>
Date:	Fri, 6 Sep 2013 09:16:49 +1000
Authentication-results:	mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected]; dkim=fail [email protected]; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) d=gmail.com
Delivered-to:	[email protected]
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NQrf7PBUs5eUNJuAUpiHTn0LuyxRtkGKnY88Ssd5UbM=; b=rDhlTFfPz4WGe3k6VHStZXoHdsQo95r4KoVIm8B/NbnvbUc3Gc3algwTxpEv2drUdK oeVHFLHYOhGzTpR+kqjGclDBirZL+PVLzOHj2l4PGhMqdUnVb40rZt1OCxRxLB7IRvFS Pb+HsDuXq2AK6XfUR8yFff1V41CRE8wFlh+ynPFhikmQzTitGi2/Hho8KBILh9CMQkVU s7lKUEWV8HRAoO68ZBHbQswziyVpnntyi+QrsenduxxQrTVSxpR56DzXQB3JcSeQDTXV NWOIMnfbviSR9kiefSNLutyvGWlN6+eAwG2iT0HgD6eXLgFgUDeL5GdtV05OJFJokwNX cBkQ==
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hello group,

have a look at this:

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/hijuno/

Now, can we use this technique to combine the efforts of many
transmitters to produce a collective, higher EIRP? Individually seen,
each transmitter does not break the law by sticking to the limit. If,
say, I have two equally configured transmitters on two slightly
different FFT bins, can I combine the two bins in order to get a
better S/N? Would that be a 3 dB improvement? What if I have more than
two (a whole continent?) worth of transmitters? :-)

73, Dimitris VK1SV

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Say HI to Juno (or VK on LF)?, Dimitrios Tsifakis <= Re: LF: Say HI to Juno (or VK on LF)?, Graham

Previous by Date:	LF: VE1VDM Grabber on 136khz, Vernon
Next by Date:	LF: OPERA 470KHz, Graham
Previous by Thread:	LF: VE1VDM Grabber on 136khz, Vernon
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Say HI to Juno (or VK on LF)?, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]