Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: QRN

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: QRN
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 13:43:29 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <0D5F8C81FCD24061BCDE1F5E2C9785E7@AGB> <[email protected]> <C65A1A5468AC4129A022E8D3FC8FC5C2@AGB> <[email protected]> <7B14049AB0084B3EB5BA4E6BB153ECB8@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <D4E860104C534ADCBA2746B4AD0400E6@gnat> <[email protected]> <0C39801A58B2410F8B02BE0908F7BF7C@gnat> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MF,

Thanks to the watching stations on 630m WSPR-2. Propagation seems to be quite limited now in April, see attachment. It appears that the DX range is better on LF than on MF, assuming the same ERP!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 12.04.2013 17:11, schrieb Stefan Schäfer:
LF/MF,

There is quite high QRN today on LF and MF. Even some few local lightnings here. After a long time i switched from LF to MF, starting with some WSPR-2 now. The conds seem to be quite poor so far. However the MF DX cluster reports from CW contacts between many stations, at least arround 22 UTC and later.
I'll join today.

73, Stefan/DK7FC, listening to BBC at 198 kHz via Twente SDR while writing this email ;-)

Attachment: WSPR_MF.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>