To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: NAVTEX vs AMTOR-FEC |
From: | Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:49:32 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 |
Steinar, See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navtex#Technical_InformationHowever some of the experts may want to add further informations. I would like to know them as well :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.03.2013 16:28, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: Hummmmm, This went wrong. It was meant to be a question: What is the advantage of NAVTEX over AMTOR-FEC? LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Den 18.03.2013 16:18, skrev Steinar Aanesland:Hi all The advantage of NAVTEX over AMTOR-FEC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: NAVTEX vs AMTOR-FEC, Steinar Aanesland |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR -2 SNR, Roelof Bakker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: NAVTEX vs AMTOR-FEC, Steinar Aanesland |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: NAVTEX vs AMTOR-FEC, Gary - G4WGT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |