Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?

To: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?
From: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:13:36 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Sz6Txh6A7N2+0swBuBbyEuulGHGubEc7EACf2cJtN6E=; b=FMFEsZ/9oBRmqwEvykety7SW8t9zE+9Kriqfx+TypWj6GkVclovrBlVc7ZFRpwR2dt z9N/uJye3ssuusbmPnzGMI8nGi3I5qazb/EKe8j3n5UIIpNn67hbkRywubVBj9Rs+R2L rOPdHVl+gtW0WfoG5o2bEchpeq/Qnzmf9QjWEW/BmKjGJWklL6O0WmM/nyCb3Z1tzEoQ IiirKL38pzd7bnG0oo/Jxsj7C0niWVt6d8oNT54JZyvKiT/M1EkkppN/DYmgoKJWJJh/ gGECgWPJZebtujEcM2r/NTTEQ3g+6pwv60wChgc5Ef33vyM8c1zG7X4YwzC0oLTH01HO NYOw==
In-reply-to: <63C5AFAA6F8C41A7936F2069D38FAC01@AGB>
References: <0A4D88A68FCB4F22A2BC40825788A6AA@AGB> <[email protected]> <63C5AFAA6F8C41A7936F2069D38FAC01@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Graham, Pete,

    We have been running ssb here for years on 500kHz, no problems. 
In the Fall and Winter we have a weekly ssb net on 510 kHz usb.
Bob W2ZM (WE2XGR/6) has even been copied by Finbar on ssb.

I have had good results with slow scan tv on 500 as far out as Ohio, perhaps 600kM from here.

73 Warren K2ORS


On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Pete
 
Its  quite  obvious that  the  allocation  is   quite  able  to  support  normal   armature  activity , and  why  not  ? its no  longer a experimental  allocation , its just the  same  as   10  or top  band , un expected  results  today though !  ssb  sounds  odd  , may  be  as  the  path is  stable ,   sstv ?  must  be a  narrow  mode  , and the  'new'  digital  voice  is 2KHz  , but that  requires  a  linear  Tx  path 
 
As  for  the  band edge
 
 I'm  straining  to  find  a  engineering   reason  , that  wspr  and  qrss  has  decided to  run mid band ? Im sure  users had a  reasonable discussion  at the  introduction  of the  band , to  place the  modes  at the  edges , with  live  cw a the  lower  portion ?  its well  know  that  these  long  carrier  modes  cause  disruption  to  other  band  users and  are  well  placed  at the  band  edges  , 'vanity  beacons'  is a term I have  seen  noted  in referral, as occupancy  increases , by users  not  linked or  even  aware  of   discussions   taking place on these  groups , i'm sure there  will  be  problems  leading  to  the  introduction  of  band plan's  , for  some  the  plans  form  part of the  licence  conditions ..
 
Is Opera  a vanity  system ? , actually  no, it  compliments   ros-  data  mode in that  the  ave s/n   readings  can be used to  determine  if  a  path  will  support  the  data  mode , each  having  the  same   averaging  s/n  reading  taken along the  time  line  ,
 
73 -G..
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

From: M0FMT
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?

Hi all
 
One SSB channel at the high edge of the band only used during daylight hours no DXing!

73 es GL es HNY Pete M0FMT IO91UX
From: Graham <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2013, 16:13
Subject: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ?

Quite  intriguing  propagation  on this  'new'  band
 
From  some  unexpected  early  600 mile  +   Opera  decodes  last  night  , to  several   wspr   TA  decodes ,  [G8's  again ..]     to   today's   test  with  Gary  using   USB-SSB  voice ,
 
Where  as at   1300z   we  had  5/9  signals each  way  as  expected   over 25 miles  ,  GI3PDN   Ray  , called  on CW , to   give  a  report of  5/9 across  the  Irish   Sea  , some  100  miles  for  our  two  signals , his  CW also  in the  5/9/9  region, one  wonders  how  far  inland  the signals  travelled  ?
 
After a  short 3  way  qso,  we closed the  test  round 1330z  ,  may  not of been  quite  as  sociable  after  dark  , but  with a  small  Ae  , 40 x 70  ft  iv L  and   35  ft  Top load  vert  , 50  watts  pep  , results  defiantly   superior  to  say  160  mtrs  using  the  same  Ae's
 
73 -G
G0NBD
 
 
 





--
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1

 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>