Stefan
Alan is encouraged to step into the discussion and set us straight ... but I believe that the
colorado.edu DST chart is a 'best estimate' prediction. The 'actual' DST levels for the period are
supplied at a later date after more data is gathered. So it's conceivable that it may be off in
terms of level and timing. Also, it's not uncommon to see 'some' time lag on propagation improvement
once DST levels have risen. Perhaps there is 'some' delay on the 'leading edge' of the event as
well.
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: LF: T/A
Hi Jay,
Thanks for monitoring and the report.
Didn't you say there is no chance when DST levels are below - 20 nT? Why
was the SNR so good this time?
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 08.10.2012 13:27, schrieb [email protected]:
Stefan & T/A enthusiasts
20 dB+ s/n in 28 mHz last night despite Tstorms off the east coast. DST was already on the
downslide during the reception period but seemed to have little effect on your signal ... ending
up at about -40 nT at the 0600Z fadeout. Currently DST at -110 nT ... ;~(
http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html .
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 6:24 PM
Subject: LF: Beacon to the west
LF,
This night i'm on 136.172 kHz again, running good old DFCW-90 to the world
until about 6 UTC.
73, Stefan/DK7FC
|
