Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: wsjtx

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: wsjtx
From: Joe Taylor <joe@Princeton.EDU>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:51:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <003101cdb50d$a59685c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References: <000a01cdb507$101bd370$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003101cdb50d$a59685c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
Hi Mal and all,

G3KEV wrote:
Still no decode on 501.5 Khz  but good waterfall display. Pity it
was not CW or QRSS then I could get an ID
JT9 signals should decode at signal levels well below what you can copy 
on CW or QRSS -- and with much larger information content.
If you believe you have examples of JT9 receptions that "should" have 
decoded, but did not, please send me the *.wav files.  (You must have 
checked "Save All" on the WSJT-X "Save" menu.)
        -- 73, Joe, K1JT


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>