Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: wsjtx |
| From: | Joe Taylor <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:51:40 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <003101cdb50d$a59685c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| References: | <000a01cdb507$101bd370$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <003101cdb50d$a59685c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 |
Hi Mal and all, G3KEV wrote: Still no decode on 501.5 Khz but good waterfall display. Pity it was not CW or QRSS then I could get an ID JT9 signals should decode at signal levels well below what you can copy on CW or QRSS -- and with much larger information content. If you believe you have examples of JT9 receptions that "should" have decoded, but did not, please send me the *.wav files. (You must have checked "Save All" on the WSJT-X "Save" menu.)
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: JT9-1 QSO?, Stefan Schäfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: Answers to some JT9 questions, mal hamilton |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: wsjtx, mal hamilton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: wsjtx, mal hamilton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |