Hi Stefan.
I should have said was there to remove any BC overload which it does vey
well
Ken
M0KHW
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
Sent: 15 September 2012 01:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite
Hi Ken,
I just tried to use the 500 Ohm input and the 18k Ohm output. It works
UFB but then i got worried about destroying the filter due to the
up-transformation on the input (the max. input voltage is 2 V rms). Thus
i decided to rebuilt the circuit as it has been before and will
eventually use an uptransformer behind the filter. But probably this is
not necessary because the MF noisef floor is still 20 dB above my
RX+soundcard noise floor...
After readjusting the C, now the passband ripple is < 0.5 dB.
This is the schematic:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF%20Filter%20schematic.png
(You know, someone has done it all before and it is nothing new ;-) ).
Will you order and use some of them?
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 13.09.2012 21:47, schrieb Ken:
> Hi Stefan.
> Fully understand.
>
> 73.
> Ken.
> M0KHW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
> Sent: 13 September 2012 20:03
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> OK but later. I want to try some modifications, i.e. using the 500 Ohm
> input and the 18 kOhm output, to have some gain. If this does not affect
> the matching, i would prefer that...
>
> 73, Stefan
> Am 13.09.2012 20:43, schrieb Ken:
>
>> Stefan.
>> Thank you for the info, maybe sometime you will be able to post the
>>
> circuit?
>
>> 73.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> M0KHW
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
>> Sent: 13 September 2012 12:26
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: MF tonite
>>
>> Ah yes, Thomas was faster, damn ;-)
>>
>> Another image from the experimental setup, using source followers
>>
>>
>
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/Mechanical_filter_with_source-followers
>
>> .JPG
>> The results have been very good last night!
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>>
>> Am 13.09.2012 13:12, schrieb Thomas Rosenkranz:
>>
>>
>>> Hy Ken,
>>>
>>> the name of the mechanical filter is FZ02
>>> http://www.oppermann-electronic.de/html/hf-spezialbauteile.html
>>>
>>> http://dm4tr.bplaced.net/index.php?section=Receiver
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Thomas DM4TR
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken"<[email protected]>
>>> To:<[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 10:28 AM
>>> Subject: LF: RE: MF tonite
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Stefan.
>>> What mechanical filter are you using?.
>>> 73.
>>> Ken
>>> M0KHW
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer
>>> Sent: 12 September 2012 21:02
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: LF: MF tonite
>>>
>>> Christian,
>>>
>>> Are you QRV tonite? I would like to see or better hear the difference of
>>> my RX performance when using my band filter i was testing in the
>>> afternoon.
>>>
>>> It is the mechanical filter which uses source followers at the input and
>>> output, to provide a constant accurate impedance matching to keep the
>>> passband ripple as low as possible. The afternoons tests have been very
>>> promising, see https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/MF%20Filter.png
>>> This is the frequency response:
>>>
>>>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/473%20kHz%20ZF%20Filter%2040%20dB.png
>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>> There should be a much better image rejection now and so maybe a few
>>> more dB SNR... Unfortunately the filter does not cover the 502 kHz
>>> region. But this problem will be gone in some months...
>>>
>>> Will be on 472.5 kHz soon.
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>>
>>
>
>
|
