| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question. |
| From: | "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 1 Jun 2012 18:50:56 -0000 |
| In-reply-to: | <9327865B4D2146DC9D9667D4740BAA56@AGB> |
| References: | <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <CAMFjj70+gM-ukas=NGMLyYwpL_wKnr-Mx3B6JH23XTr7yk_k9A@mail.gmail.com> <02bb01cd3eb1$c4cb1730$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <FD3EEE4477AD463089804699410F9188@AGB> <[email protected]> <18D068A53AF74F56BF8AFDCCAB65CC62@AGB> <[email protected]> <97F0E98E40814C45B796CFAF1351D46C@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <3DD43F40887A4C08A4F53031CB126B04@AGB> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <9327865B4D2146DC9D9667D4740BAA56@AGB> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello... I was wondering the following: I have here 4x Spectrum Lab task running at one PC to serve my SUB9KHz grabber page at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb I use that Sampling Rate detector in all 4 Spectrum Lab tasks. Is that OK, or need I only one Sampling Rate detector that callibrates the other 3 tasks to ? (one master - 3 clients without that SR cal active) 73's Peter - PA1SDB |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Ae!...and this day, Graham |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question., Stefan Schäfer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Ae!...and this day, Graham |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: "SR cal" in spectrum lab question., Stefan Schäfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |