Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: InV L Top wire config - Best Option ??

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: InV L Top wire config - Best Option ??
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:22:10 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1340324633; bh=GpFrqZlGn+iDV5jBNAEfEa3sswpP6N31L0QnsR2fEik=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=pNWjFHBP/XZXnBmF6ZSlKCf3B7Dd18TNzKU1ZEMCeun14W9NJsxjSPDi79jbi3d/m+1i0IW6TAsG1a0q3U7vh62lYHWQSXY3N/G47pJNQXAWcNhj2IrrM20+hD/veBKTLLhaigihY/Dje6dk+LlAEyR0GcYWPkLVXXzr/qdWv8Q=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=4iwLXtKT5bGXecUQFCO32vJqa6g7ht9qOWv3+v/fxkE0IusU46/xWl/4sMnhQUrjjJKEi5ppvPoJapJ5cZtHmcuoMKXqBhgZnYAetLMnQBhlw2www1HvE7lz6HUrQtqLabKNvd18OVHZ+fjWbKfV/Eka/VZKFefwpnhiLhYqo4k= ;
References: <F607F91680294719BF83E8070F66B91D@AGB> <452F9ADDDA624E5EB9C8246BDDC6D264@gnat> <6FDC0CECCC3645EB922AF21E66965518@AGB> <AC509F93353848149D8E1E62C2D29305@gnat> <90E09B502D3D481992365586D42423DA@AGB> <5D772617FCC94283913EDABE7CB175FE@gnat> <5D44E645126C4841A77C08064C39E92C@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Grahan .mmmmm 10 feet?? that could reduce your effective height to 10feet makingi it 6dB (maybe not quite that bad) worse than the 40 foot pole on its own. The only plus point would be if that "radial" gives you a substantial reduction in ground loss.....which I doubt is the case.
 
Seriously you do need to measure it to get the best out of a difficult situation.......no amount of urban myth will give the right answer. Remember higher "aerial current" is no use if its going straight to ground (like a shunt cap across the feed point) and not traversing the radiation resistance. You want as much current as possible to flow though the radiation resistance (the vertical bit connected to the feed point) then you want a big cap (=low impedance) from the top of the loading coil  to earth for the "return current" (low loss resistance)  Not a very technical way of describing it :-))  even capacitance from the active pole to ground gives some loss....the inductive top load reduces that by reducing the voltage on that section.
 
Alan
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>