Re: LF: Getting started.

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Getting started.
From:	Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 27 May 2012 01:25:14 +0200
In-reply-to:	<38200134-1338048810-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-439947260-@b15.c22.bise6.blackberry>
References:	<38200134-1338048810-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-439947260-@b15.c22.bise6.blackberry>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3


Hi Tom,

For LF RX, i still haven't tried it but this may be a good idea:http://www.w1vd.com/k9ay11.pdfBut you can also start with a omnidirectional E field antenna or anormal resonated loop.


73, Stefan/DK7FC.

Am 26.05.2012 18:13, schrieb [email protected]:

Ok, I am looking at all the fun you all are having on LF. I have a few RXers 
that go down to 100 Kc, what do you all recommend for a receiver for 173 Kc or 
lower?

I have seen many discussions about a vertical versus a magnetic loop.
What website do you recommend for a LF vertical?
What website for a mag loop?

De KD4WOV Tom

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Getting started., kd4wov Re: LF: Getting started., John Bruce McCreath Re: LF: Getting started., Stefan Schäfer <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: todays qso, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	LF: 475 kc Exiter, Uwe Wensauer
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Getting started., John Bruce McCreath
Next by Thread:	LF: todays qso, "Eberhard v.Wedelstädt"
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]