LF: Re: Sending attachments through the reflector

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	LF: Re: Sending attachments through the reflector
From:	"Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:43:24 -0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1328100164; bh=QRG4l3ayrJykbu52vZSTMttXr7pNqDLJEyXyJLyas08=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=0DoPnCWiEg9aYIZJPBJ7q/GN0zmtZ/fc9u81yUTJgmfkj93t9VP1ux+P5/D667j/f+lyY1uM3+WIEuASrpLzGUSEXAE0OjLbk2wCahoDNMxEh/eV3jwLbOhy2702D/BQEm7LTrASriyG+kG4GeKdiktI8kiGf7+Ewf6+M3xeT0A=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=wdM9DckWBXIckHFaQeZFGSdZXc7tcqVGnxjN5rmN3B6GvwOldA4gcgDAWsRVIeUHSaJCyKp9QBIGbWyM40FK8GqO3KlpFojeGhDzkF2kHLDoXnHGt0AhbmjPhlIl8Oq62A6/F/cdQbVknre1EukhhriMaE+4etDgJMxh/rZlW5o= ;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
References:	<000901cce02a$24679c40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <002d01cce034$8dfb0020$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <56A353265F164E90896C94B6BF2557E5@intelp4> <002301cce077$2c5a30a0$4001a8c0@lark> <001501cce0b7$2da189a0$88e49ce0$@com>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi Terry yes its a fairly antiquated bit of software and there is a bug that
it seems to count lines in the header rather than parse it. The result is it
you add an attachment and forget the subject line the parser gets all
knotted up. :-)) and starts to stick the text interpreation of the
attachment on the subject line. As a result it loses the attachment.
Sorry its probably the most noticable bug in the Majordomo suite.

Alan
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry GW0EZY" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 7:57 AM
Subject: LF: Sending attachments through the reflector


> Alan
>
> Thanks for the tip. I didn't know that and it makes an awful mess. In my
> excitement to send the grab, I must have forgot to put a subject text in!
>
> Unfortunately no Wolf copy last night as about 3:00 am Windows decided to
> update and reboot my PC without asking! I'll have to change the
auto-update
> settings.
>
> 73 Terry GW0EZY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alan Melia
> Sent: 31 January 2012 21:08
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: LF: Re: Content-Type:
> multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0077_01CCE04C.836E4500"
>
> Terry you must put a subject text in if you add an attachment otherwise
the
> parser gets confused and loses it place....that is the reason for the
> garbage
>
> Alan
> G3NYK
>
> >
> >
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0077_01CCE04C.836E4500", Alan Melia LF: Sending attachments through the reflector, Terry GW0EZY LF: Re: Sending attachments through the reflector, Alan Melia <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Wolf 137.294, John Andrews
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: Wolf 137.294, Markus Vester
Previous by Thread:	LF: Sending attachments through the reflector, Terry GW0EZY
Next by Thread:	LF: DK7FC hell audible in Moscow, Alex K
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]