Re: LF:TA ( NOT ) NOW here

To:	"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF:TA ( NOT ) NOW here
From:	Andy - KU4XR <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1323567725; bh=QbLoC72+NYEqhR2YXXaapa6hZ2LFXZLZaWqfwmJc+As=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=M/CkubAYC2VF4Wzc+B1wlAZjXbauuzd5VQy46WKLIvspQhihIrMHysw/fLzk8qiNpX6KnGFmifIyxqQH50e4PhQSM3dLcWf64DKaeLz0RWROrAZShbyLlh6l9wj2Y4m9qXKdy/N4nwGW05dfBNT6AeEvxy1no+fbsyitPhLQPRM=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=o5Mo5KzdyCVwqWBJXTdzvcxNq7VzKg3M6nw2PcsqyohMdG+XLjpgckkbeo39cgeGkXARod2T7ZdndlaXI0E00s9BuMKJR9UbVzXJtSGorwKwffbZerWgmtDYB1uVZJp0dZpdsLSa0qvtTOyggCZI2tQvwPd198cqjU6T64b78NI=;
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

LF: Not a hint of anyones signal tonite here in EM75xr.. Very disappointing, 
BUT: the night is still young..
I looked at Spaceweather.com, and the Kp index is at " 3 " .. I remember past 
comments being made
that when the Kp index went above " 2 " ; then LF signal " seemed " to be 
affected by that...
That is beyond my level to understand though... I have checked DCF-39, at it is 
very strong here, just
missing the Amateur signals ... I had a feeling it would be this way tonite, 
But; still looking...
 
73 all: Andy - KU4XR

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, jcraig Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF:TA ( NOT ) NOW here, Andy - KU4XR <= LF:TA ( NOT ) NOW ( But is again ) here, Andy - KU4XR RE: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Laurence KL7UK Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, jcraig Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, jcraig LF: T/A, jrusgrove LF: TA: XGJ & VO1NA, Dave G3WCB. Re: LF: TA: XGJ & VO1NA, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: TA: XGJ & VO1NA, jcraig

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, jcraig
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Fw: TA NOW, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Thread:	LF:TA ( NOT ) NOW ( But is again ) here, Andy - KU4XR
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]