To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 137.5kHz QRP WSPR [better] |
From: | Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:18:48 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ESS+ovlursmpQxtRabI8hn6egkPGKf6yJ2IBtOmn80k=; b=D+ul3wTRvHzUwbdiHJ6QtV2VeuCELm23WWHMD5RGrDMwKU22Xm0ntLuqWAEXbcWiE7 vGwx/wcsI/NWLj094PxHwdc1lGAcIggJb4i5iI5DrXrHcTzopwGMXyCa0oTfmiJgEDgA QFXroFePva5hhGmhV31J5i1xrk1VdoD66EnLE= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <CAHAQVWOdmEErUWm6iiQXH2-Z7T5K-_1f-0tAFMQKXqsyo0N=aQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Even stronger at 2146z (-19dB S/N) Dave. Even with the current ERP I'm beginning to get out with WSPR at last. Still running the transverter PA from 13.8V, so should be able to squeeze several more dB with higher supply volts. These are the stations that have now reported my QRP WSPR signals on 137.5kHz so far. I don't think I've missed anyone. Until last week I was running <100uW ERP but I am now running around 500-600uW ERP and the difference is noticeable. G6ALB G3WCD G3XIZ (46km) G3XVL (69km) M0BMU (69km) G3WCB (101km) G3YXM (148km) M0PPP (182km) GW0EZY (251km) 73s Roger G3XBM
On 12 November 2011 21:45, Dave G3WCB. <[email protected]> wrote:
-- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: TA DFCW to VE, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 600m_just_now, John Pumford-Green |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 137.5kHz QRP WSPR [better], Dave G3WCB. |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: 137.5kHz QRP WSPR, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |