Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO
From:	Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to:	<E4492DB6588D42089A66EEE10683DC0C@White>
References:	<E4492DB6588D42089A66EEE10683DC0C@White>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Please keep in mind that when viewing QRSS modulated signal on the narrowband display, we are only seeing the average voltage of the carrier component, depending on the keying duty cycle (eg. -6 dB for 50% weight). In terms of power, 50% is saved, 25% goes to the carrier, and 25% to the keying sidebande. For the somewhat "lighter" callsigns (XNS and XES DFCW dots), the difference is more like 8 to 10 dB, confirmed by their solid traces during earlier straight-carrier transmissions.

Best 73,

Markus (DF6NM)

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]>
Verschickt: Di, 11 Okt 2011 9:08 am
Betreff: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO

This morning, I was pleased to find good signals from XGJ and XKO in the "standard" 21 mHz TA window. There were also faint carrier traces from XNS and XES in the slow 0.438 mHz FFT.

Thanks for providing the signals!

Best 73,

Markus

(DF6NM in Nuernberg JN59NJ)

http://www.alice-dsl.net/df6nm/grabber/Grabber.htm

http://www.alice-dsl.net/df6nm/grabber/TAnarrow.jpg

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Markus Vester Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Markus Vester Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Markus Vester <= Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Warren Ziegler Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, James Moritz Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Warren Ziegler

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: DCF39 and 153 EU stations peak!, Stefan Schäfer
Next by Date:	Re: LF: T/A [137KHZ] XNS , XGJ , XES , XKO last night, Michel Brunel
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Markus Vester
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO, Warren Ziegler
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]