Re: LF: DM4TR?

To:	<[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: DM4TR?
From:	Minto Witteveen <[email protected]>
Date:	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:43:00 +0200
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer :x-mimeole; bh=01mU17nDlOmPt3xVzdZT0p3y3jS9bYssqZaMC8p4IKA=; b=Yb8hXvYaKMwTk8B1XoL99ya36L73iUOoQheWFE3fSU4GyKJC50FBhBuSokj2gDODIc TpleSsM5RAtpqUHaRWqDPHNssrZ6OT5zdFV78g7dnRmdCZH5IpZUX/hnGZztzdDbzu0d lIYoiQWviAekEWblh6cMygXWiWu8+xqqL+jN8=
Importance:	Normal
In-reply-to:	<499CE820968D462FB5CCF11C4E83B9A5@IBM7FFA209F07C>
References:	<499CE820968D462FB5CCF11C4E83B9A5@IBM7FFA209F07C>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hi All,

DM4TR as seen on my grabber.

73’s Minto pa3bca

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse

From: Chris

Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 18:18

To: RSGB LF Group

Subject: LF: DM4TR?

Hi All,

Looks like DM4TR sending CQ QRSS3 just LF of 137.7 but difficult to be sure due to static crashes. Anybody confirm please?

Vy 73, Chris, G4AYT, Whitstable, Kent, JO01MI.

2011-09-18 18-41-26.png
Description: PNG image

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: DM4TR?, Chris Re: LF: DM4TR?, Minto Witteveen <= Re: LF: DM4TR?, Chris Re: LF: DM4TR?, Stefan Schäfer