To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: conds to the west? |
From: | John Andrews <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:52:24 -0400 |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <001e01cc7918$7adb7340$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <002701cc7990$ed9888f0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Stephan, FN42ch. As the noise levels improve in the next month, longer duration copy will be possible. John, W1TAG Sent from my iPhone On Sep 23, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello John, > > Anyway, very nice copy, thanks. The K is quite clear i think ;-) And the last > fragments of a C are visible too. Now we know that just a few dB and a bit > less QSB is necessary. No guesswork any more ;-) > > What is your locator please? > > Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 23.09.2011 13:09, schrieb John Andrews: >> Stephan, >> >> After the promising start, only fragments were seen overnight until EU >> sunrise, when there was a brief reinforcement. >> >> John, W1TAG >> > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: VE7TIL long integration grabber online..., Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: conds to the west?, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: conds to the west?, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: conds to the west?, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |