Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: FMT Beacon

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: FMT Beacon
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:48:36 +0100 (BST)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1314143317; bh=94qY8rxjiYPxRk0XKV21W5OifyMDwU7RamtcQqXJEbs=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=n8fI4vkMBjVrrJHzhqkL69sJhAifBtScsX7SilPxETEYY98mrPeeu5hQ2HudDOYUPS3RU7k3+sHzc0hnt6MjpYNirJIq7xuawU8yIo+sbpGNlVnGd1ZDCYpRbXmaJpxkD/eNWZYpVyP2L2OUQE23XegdlHJiICAhEhNfaqqQgIM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KwseYKg+TsXY4ueQRRWSHV4LIcqZZjLGqm0zG+CEAc7di/UAwqnWroNyh4W1K2e7ZQweJtlDGeLcPWZMWxuJM4BZFyRyNjeXAUbSamUjLtoL/gng3bzLQzRnINpDuDw/4cJ1xz9+layMQ7meadGSUZ6cXq1FHdIre3UqedPIvG8=;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <3DF96EA3CB9342459F51F3B80781DF99@AGB>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
OK Graham
 
500 is dead around here I can't use it if I want what BT laughably calls Broadband because 500 knocks it right out for days owing to the very slow recovery time of their clapped out DSLAMs. However 136 seems OK at the current power level which is in the 50W region at the moment. 138 being the notch between upstream and down stream ADSL spectrum whereas 500 sits right in the middle of the down stream spectrum and even a couple of Watts at the input terminals of the ATU completely flattens it. It is seen as noise on the circuit which automatically reduces data rate to maintain communication allbeit at a very slow speed. Trouble is it just doesn't come right back up when the 500 signal goes off it stays down for days so I complain then they switch it back up again manually. Even spark transmissions from O/H11kV lines trigger it.
 
I see DI2AM (505.180+/-) coming in well on Gary's grabber and Stefan on 136.1725+/- also, so things aren't too bad at the moment.
 
73 es GN Petefmt IO91UX (abt150miles from you)

From: Graham <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: FMT Beacon
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 23 August, 2011, 23:58

Ok Pete ..never had much  luck on  137 ..but   500  is well  down  at the  moment ..
 
G..

From: M0FMT
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: LF: FMT Beacon

Graham
 
I will try to be QRV tomorrow on 137.696+/-.

73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX47VN

--- On Tue, 23/8/11, Graham <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Graham <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: FMT Beacon
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 23 August, 2011, 23:02

Pete / Jim
 
What   QRG ?
 
G..

From: M0FMT
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:07 PM
Subject: Re: LF: FMT Beacon

Thanks for the report Jim
 
Have raise the antenna by 1.5m. But not as good into G4wgt as I was a few months ago. Could be conditions? QRT now.

73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX47VN

--- On Tue, 23/8/11, James Moritz <[email protected]> wrote:

From: James Moritz <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: FMT Beacon
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 23 August, 2011, 18:04

Dear Pete, LF Group,

Your (M0)FMT QRSS beacon was "O" copy about 5uV/m here near Hatfield at about 1630utc.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>