Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Re: Ferrite Receive Antennas

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Ferrite Receive Antennas
From: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:07:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Hello Peter,

Thanks for the link, very interesting and relating to the current discussion :-) I expect many of us are reading the dissertation right now ;-)

Especially fig. 5-16 on page 139 is interesting. Downscaling to a µr of 400 (in my case) is required but anyway the trend/dependency is useful to see. Anyway, both, the diameter and length is useful to improve the SNR. But for my /p antenna, making the rod much longer than it currently is (=28 cm) makes not much sense if the goal is an antenna that can be carried in a backpack. Once it becomes 1 m and longer, a simple single turn loop could be used as well...

Going on reading now :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 19.08.2011 20:35, schrieb pws:
Hi,

O.K., once again. Seems like to post into /dev/null...

I wrote:
> All you need about constructing ferrite loops and what you can do using > this kind of antenna:
> "New Potential of Low-Frequency Radionavigation in the 21st Century"
> Doctoral thesis of Wouter Johan PELGRUM.
>
> Get it there:
> http://www.vhl.tudelft.nl/pelgrum/formulier.adp
>
> Skip all Loran-C specific parts jumping just to chapter 5.
> Included are many useful graphics about geometry,
> winding lengths, bundling vs. stacking, arrays,
> "counter wound" loops, screening, etc.
>
> It's worth reading even without understanding all that math - like me.

Peter, df3lp


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>