To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: frequency doubler and divider |
From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:16:15 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XlLQwC3sysmH+wNz9adP6utF66/RAOAAHuDx+CzhHgY=; b=WWsWGh1R2Vlv3Twuz05ZTUcxH0JajfAxnayI5A0Of4DnyEpRW3TMjkigXUXr0Q63Ke G/5yfY0yB7CtcsO6Mgo7WRctB3jwx4MO7nd6PE0VMl+6Gx18KkCQN/yv5Cj8Sbfo1qqd C+rbStgvk3SAMb+1ldM5yfjmeQCwgLDr4t1iA= |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
No, that doesn't work to give a true square wave. If the RC delay is not exactly 50% you get a repeated double pulse waveform and not a series of equally spaced 2.F pulses. On dividing this by 2, you end up with exactly what you had before.
Been there - done that.. :-)
The only practical way is to double the frequency, filter it to remove all odd order terms and the half fundamental then square it up and divide.
Andy
2011/7/31 Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]> LF, VLF, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: frequency doubler and divider, Stefan Schäfer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: frequency doubler and divider, Stefan Schäfer |
Previous by Thread: | LF: frequency doubler and divider, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: frequency doubler and divider, Stefan Schäfer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |