To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:23:48 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1302877414; bh=Rlgigea+McdkC0UC5xcRw8RwG4Q26sOqhetw6efXFCU=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=e7q4UPxSkYLtqZG+QXlQrs1UHKcX5W53r8S1+Rt0LcXZm8i3UB45qc2lbnMYNi26lvqu5zFx9Y+YTa1J8N5w4PU8N7D0bKqqS+XgkzmRC0VfryVPWCmXre+2UN79iMhZdqZLM0zQG3XcsD7JwWOUG0ChMSntIjWaQ/QKwOLjntU= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=L26NLlD4pUR+NrzMTRiYDYp4br/pbiFTvcXGypmwvtFK8gwX+4fEIJf4aF8AUao/6uEijG2BSPx6WXvy9yhcjvAgU8MSQ9+Ki+RllMRUIQ0og3sK5p61Q8r49lfWvfv8JYhJdQkgR5w3YXoSYsPVrOywp1r5fRh3JhscB5N66wU= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Chris Ah it just depends what you are measuring it with as well !! Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:57 PM Subject: Re: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements > Hello Chris, > > I would expect a sqare law relationship as well since the probe is a > capacitive divider and thus the voltage should be directly proportional > to the antennas voltage. And this rises with sqrt(2) x the power... > > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 15.04.2011 14:40, schrieb Chris Osborn: > > LF, > > Acting on advice I have installed a whip aerial (probe) on top of a > > mast at the boundary of my property. > > This is in order to monitor my VLF transmissions and to provide a > > reference level for any system improvements. > > I noticed that the probe's pick-up voltage is directly proportional > > to my PA's supply current. > > Assuming that the PA efficiency doesn't change drastically with > > current then would I be correct in assuming that the probe's voltage > > is _directly proportional_ to the radiated power? > > I was expecting a square law relationship . . > > 73 > > Chris G3XIZ > > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: RE: VLF - vertical probe measurements, Rik Strobbe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: olivia 500/16 ROS HF 500/8 beacon 501 USB, Graham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements, Stefan Schäfer |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: VLF - vertical probe measurements, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |