Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements
From: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:23:48 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1302877414; bh=Rlgigea+McdkC0UC5xcRw8RwG4Q26sOqhetw6efXFCU=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=e7q4UPxSkYLtqZG+QXlQrs1UHKcX5W53r8S1+Rt0LcXZm8i3UB45qc2lbnMYNi26lvqu5zFx9Y+YTa1J8N5w4PU8N7D0bKqqS+XgkzmRC0VfryVPWCmXre+2UN79iMhZdqZLM0zQG3XcsD7JwWOUG0ChMSntIjWaQ/QKwOLjntU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=L26NLlD4pUR+NrzMTRiYDYp4br/pbiFTvcXGypmwvtFK8gwX+4fEIJf4aF8AUao/6uEijG2BSPx6WXvy9yhcjvAgU8MSQ9+Ki+RllMRUIQ0og3sK5p61Q8r49lfWvfv8JYhJdQkgR5w3YXoSYsPVrOywp1r5fRh3JhscB5N66wU= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi Chris Ah it just depends what you are measuring it with as well !!
Alan G3NYK

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: VLF - vertical probe measurements


> Hello Chris,
>
> I would expect a sqare law relationship as well since the probe is a
> capacitive divider and thus the voltage should be directly proportional
> to the antennas voltage. And this rises with sqrt(2) x the power...
>
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
> Am 15.04.2011 14:40, schrieb Chris Osborn:
> > LF,
> > Acting on advice I have installed a whip aerial (probe) on top of a
> > mast at the boundary of my property.
> > This is in order to monitor my VLF transmissions and to provide a
> > reference level for any system improvements.
> > I noticed that the probe's pick-up voltage is directly proportional
> > to my PA's supply current.
> > Assuming that the PA efficiency doesn't change drastically with
> > current then would I be correct in assuming that the probe's voltage
> > is _directly proportional_ to the radiated power?
> > I was expecting a square law relationship . .
> > 73
> > Chris G3XIZ
> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>