Hello Henny,
Wow, so the signal could be more than 10 dB stronger. When making QRO
it is important to have the antenna resonated! Reactive power is not a
good idea for some audio amp circuits.
Looking forward to your signal :-)
73, Stefan
Am 10.03.2011 16:29, schrieb henny van elst:
Hi Stefan,LF
I have a poweramp.with two times
650Watts,but I am very careful with the power,now i have 225mA antenne
curent with a amplifire two times 40 watts,so i worked on it,
henny pa3cpm
73's
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:42 PM
Subject:
Re: LF: GRABBER
Hello Henny, Uwe, VLF,
Ah, you've already seen it ;-)
I just wanted to post that i have splitted my 60000 window. Now the
range arround 8970.000 +- 4 uHz and 8970.020...8970.025 is visible.
Since it has stored the last 10 days or so in the buffer, DJ8WX's
transmission of last week is now visible in 47 uHz as well.
Uwe, what is the exact frequency on which you are transmitting? What is
the original reference frequency and what is the divider ratio?
May there be a conflict with Hennys transmission? Now we are in a range
where it is important to know the frequency to a uHz! If i look at
Victor's spectrogram, it looks Henny is slightly below 8970.022 Hz,
maybe 0.2 mHz. But this may be not enough to make out the difference
(?) Oh, i just looked at the spectrogram and see a faint trace at
8970.0217 Hz. Is it you, Henny? It's still to much guesswork but a
first step on the way to a proper ID. 3 dB QRO would be a good way to
check that :-)
73, Stefan/DK7FC
Am 10.03.2011 13:11, schrieb henny van elst:
Hi Stefan,
tu for the 60000grabber,
i will keep the tx on,
henny pa3cpm
best 73's to All.
Geen virus gevonden
in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1204 / Virusdatabase: 1497/3495 - datum van uitgifte:
03/09/11
|
|
