To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: VLF Stability and soundcard locking |
From: | M0FMT <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Mar 2011 18:36:17 +0000 (GMT) |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1299695777; bh=ohBdGMM0YLHYlsKV2rfMQM4XimP+clZ6iY7Qx/OrY7s=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=X72AR1067+bblRf2ry999sSjQHyC11gKXn0gdNUIqNNY+G8eC+yJhuMfNywsnZV4IG7To08splQN2XrIbYjzSo342B9giziEU/RjFN340gKKVX23BamDhq2KqekTjC8Gw3d2wN+Te0L+K2lNZBWeAvCiChyi5v+7eXVJ/22jFjA= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YRFhrAwK6AvFXilgz4Hc99SG+MtLO8zHH0c1neevNWuH3d4QlepO3py6hyqkNP7B1mdbo9QlivY4slzQ3guxGMFGHkK9/55jiykoIsBdu2Ep4JKSmpo5oavLGmqCBO4yVve0J4gWhPFi9wJ1ex1rI4opnCxIkBhTnL0ZBb8YoFU=; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
In-reply-to: | <003201cbde72$606d6090$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <[email protected]> <003201cbde72$606d6090$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Mal..... for my ten cents worth.
Without being able to add modulation or on-off keying then no QSO is taking place.
I suppose you could say if there is a carrier then some one is in the shack but that's not really a QSO.
I was hoping at the start of this exercise that a CW or other PSK or similar real time QSO could be carried out over say 10/20kms. From the tests Chris G3XIZ has done the best looks like a real time QSO would only happen over a 1.5km path cross town.
Academically these tests are very interesting but I don't think IMHO they are advancing Amateur Radio Communications. It will be limited to a very select number of enthusiasts who are set up to TX and RX this type of transmission. However I will continue to try and pick up Chris 11kms away. It will help me understand how to make a sensitive receiver (something I need badly)
From: mal hamilton <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 9 March, 2011 15:55:12 Subject: LF: Re: VLF Stability and soundcard locking I agree with these comments, and have said it before.
If all radio amateurs on all the other bands used this system of uh bandwidths and day long qso's Amateur Radio would cease as a hobby.
The aim should be to generate enough ERP so that a qso could take place in a reasonably short time and be observed by others in say QRS 3 - 60. SWL listeners/viewers could also particpate.
The Dreamers band will fizzle out if transmitted signals are not improved so that a larger audience can engage in the activities.
also who is going to buy a PCM2900 or similar gadgets for a ONE OFF QSO if you are lucky.
Again QSL reports on frequency alone are not VALID - it could be any carrier.
G3KEV
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: 8970.025, victor13 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: VLF Stability and soundcard locking, Roger Lapthorn |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Re: VLF Stability and soundcard locking, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: VLF Stability and soundcard locking, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |