Re: LF: VLF acty

["mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>]

I thought the ability to copy long haul signals in QRS 3 mode was an improvement over QRS 6000 or slower. It takes me minutes whereas it takes you hours and days to achieve the same object.

I think you are getting mixed up and ABUSIVE AGAIN

 

g3kev

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Roger Lapthorn

To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 7:42 PM

Subject: Re: LF: VLF acty

Mal

If you check G3ZJO, G3XDV, M0BMU, Paul Nicholson (probably others too) and my own postings and screenshots here and on the sub-9Khz Yahoo group and website you'll see very positive identification of the Europeans such as G3XIZ, DK7FC, DJ8WX and OE5ODL.

You seem unable/unwilling to resolve signals much better than a few Hz whereas better equipped stations (albeit without such big antennas, mouths and egos) are able to measure with great accuracy and can be quite sure who is being seen and when.

 

 

The best thing you can do would be to get a Dreamer's band NoV, get TXing and get some positive QSOs under your belt. We will look up to you when you are one side of the first >500km sub-9Khz QRSS3 QSO. Go for it!

73s
Roger G3XBM

On 26 March 2011 18:30, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

Am I the only one in the UK able to copy the EU STATIONS regularily around 9 khz, especially in dfcw 600 and as fast as qrs3

 

I have not seen other reception observations or recorded screen observations like I have submitted and I do not mean enhanced or overlay reconstituted material.

 

 

de g3kev

 

 

 

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088