Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: LF: BODGE ANTENNAS

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: LF: BODGE ANTENNAS
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:11:14 +0100
Accept-language: nl-NL, nl-BE
Acceptlanguage: nl-NL, nl-BE
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <007901cb9bbf$2c223810$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AcubwvYz2fUBiaceRIeeuvC9ZFxA5gABsSKi
Thread-topic: LF: BODGE ANTENNAS
In my view it does work as a loop antenna on 136 and 500kHz with the loop area being determined by the soil conductivity (lower conductivity, bigger loop area).  The very fact that it is low-Q does suggest loss.
 
Hello Roger,
 
if 
low conductivity = large loop area (A) but small antenna current (I)
high conductivity = small loop area (A) but large antenna current (I)
Would this result in A*I = constant ?
 
The radiation resistance of a loop is proportional to the square or the loop area (A). And the ERP is proportional to the square of the antenna current (I).
If A*I is a constant (independent or soil conductivity) this would mean that the ERP would no depend on soil conductivity ?
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T 
 
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>