To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Late again? [1119z 19 Dec 20101118z 19 Dec 2010] |
From: | Jacek Lipkowski <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:54:30 +0100 (CET) |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]>, <00ae01cb9fc5$697610b0$4001a8c0@lark> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Mike Dennison wrote: What's fascinating about this reflector is that I often get several replies to a posting and wonder what they are all about. Then some time later the original post arrives. Presumably the reflector itself sends the messages in order, but they arrive out of order. please note that by design smtp doesn't give any guarantee of delivering mail in any finite amount of time. your ISP probably uses greylisting to cut back spam. this is perfectly legal smtp server behaviour, but has side effects such as randomly delaying messages. you can try to complain to your mail server administrator, but i doubt this will have any effect. VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: LF: Re: Content-Type: text/plain, victor13 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Late again? [1119z 19 Dec 20101118z 19 Dec 2010], Roger Lapthorn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Late again? [1119z 19 Dec 20101118z 19 Dec 2010], Mike Dennison |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: RE: Late again? [1119z 19 Dec 20101118z 19 Dec 2010], Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |