Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: 136kHz Eu DX frequency - summary

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: 136kHz Eu DX frequency - summary
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 14:24:05 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1290349449; bh=GZ3UMe8l10/m2wOOHwWiUrkZ2vKq4WmrY4QzzAS+I/Q=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=FRgZfKdtIL74AmK9jBvqZGY9pUTagOMvA2k3q9jeUikhPOhZCI/nWKkT1mkdClZtSUCAKb9z1n71D4osOdUN2JVUu6M6s7foDGyscohIDeip8N7pBMw+icjpT5zJYfUq8vNukHUpk253ISBw/J/hzzu6sZpQU9Yu+mPaTJBrAcY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=TlWSrKdpRXmBHqlA10qj7TAI0+bmAgo3Dv9xCAkB++7fXkAVMRo0v91M4Zp4nDvuoTiHQQSpd2nqVZgdxPVU1/CIjsVzk7TukenYUpGdWC2JDSUAyDssrp8Ipgh4++Mq60qENCvseJXEe3PYCoIA1FrfRTfNdcCeUDxjBue4BzY= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Dear Mike, LF Group,

I monitored the beacons around 137.77kHz last night using SDR-IQ receiver and loop antenna - background noise was quite high due to a mains PSU problem with the PC, but it was still possible to receive signals from the US beacons reasonably well. As you can see from the screen shot, the presence of G3XDV's beacon only about 10km and a few Hz away does not greatly impair the reception of the US signals. The only significant effect on the weaker signals is that the transients that occur at key on / key off generate bright streaks with several Hz bandwidth overlapping the weaker signals - these could be eliminated by increasing frequency seperation to 10 or 20Hz. Alternatively, slower rise and fall of the keying envelope would reduce the bandwidth if these transients, at the expense of more complication in the transmitter.

So operating local and DX beacons at the same end of the band does not seem to be a massive obstacle to successful reception, and has the obvious advantage that only one narrow-band receiver is needed to monitor all the beacons, wherever you are. Perhaps it would be useful to organise some sub-bands with 10 - 20Hz spacing between regions. Receiver performance may also be an issue; the SDR-IQ has the advantage compared to "conventional" receivers that the data used to generate the spectrogram effectively comes directly from the front end of the receiver, without intervening IF, audio, mixer stages, etc. The M0BMU QTH seems to be a good test-bed for this kind of reception, due to closeness to G3XDV, so over the next few nights I intend to try similar beacon reception with different RX set-ups.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 4:50 PM
Subject: LF: 136kHz Eu DX frequency - summary


...>
Is there a real problem? I don´t think there is a practical problem
at present. Activity is low and most stations are in touch with each
other via this reflector. If/when the USA gets an allocation at
136kHz, I can see a real need for some kind of plan, but that´s not
for a while yet.
...>

Attachment: 137k7_21_11_2.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>