Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: G4JNT 503kHz Beacon |
| From: | Andy Talbot <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2010 19:27:55 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8fIlvbVopd4HHy3VcU7w4ogkTbCn15X4DW9MK5ciZmo=; b=aqTgo/ICtjNL6IX1R57D2ZbRMb/HOgwDCq4M9FQsgl44vMscE6xZomJGk0PX4dUpNN hA4pgLuIFVVLT2rhYxVq1gKHOmMkqTpBGT0AiCcTIQRhyegQS39E1ONWoi8hQgs1LTbz xngPIG2/1TV/7jqNlAx1VUDAukPMpiYe3Bmbo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wlssbr09w1yW2ZP5HRXyG8F6oYpqhmXLI2BQCUcN2LkXVFvdByBqcPl1HRsV3m60g0 Wx4Ln0R+sVQc2tODHhJNstH8FII1wClvs65le6CN+1ua6DluIBHeiZwyLoSsVeNrrasM o1tPDO0TI2HA27Qfk8MmhMYfIYrdLArwKKlGI= |
| Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
|
Is there likely to be much interest in my 503kHz beacon or is it worth looking at replacing it with a 137kHz WSPR one? Its been mostly off air for a couple of weeks while the antenna was rebuilt as a dual purpose fat HF dipole / top loaded Tee - and I still haven't got round to optimising the pre-matching for the HF bit yet.
However, it does now resonate at 503 and 137kHz and its tempting to put a low duty cycle WSPR signal on over the winter period using the 700 Watt switchmode PA which has been sitting idle for a few years now. However, a new lower power beacon Tx may be more acceptable - especially to my electricity bill.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: 153KHz view from EU, Markus Vester |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: OK2BVG_QRV, Lubos OK2BVG |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: OK2BVG_PA0A, Lubos OK2BVG |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LF: G4JNT 503kHz Beacon, Roger Lapthorn |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |