Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: XPQ on 137 rx

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: XPQ on 137 rx
From: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:50:36 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MPPeaJMs6aSWi2aCxUp2xOLOlXv9O32iu/4vTDASE94=; b=SynPsEtvpLRpnMdEDsbmJURRPj9MB0Pn9k9LV4Cgf65nf/rQ5k3rwWbxJH/oPwiedY URHlBA5+PsrfscZNb57lIRyi9yrd5xxbiJ3+U16nUaLIScJBVJ1i/c3wmFeMjtbex9iH k7y+UrHgqV0lSbozUnR+4b9nd01XxlyiAsTMw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ch/OitYd8qW/iAmeBaykQ8AUziq7k8IGG9fHnCZDsUJfzhUlFenIby8p01+zH3imuf YelOU0JF8JeKPSObgOIOZrMXulnta43jeViLDG8Q0I/f+RwaV/TTnRMXUtwgksKWWAGw JZAys/5KQ3DWmvQ1xZE5bAuelEdkZmKSG4b3I=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thanks to Steve and Scott for the info on JA7NI - I will stay at
137.7798 which is well clear of his signal - also I note that at this
time of year there is no time of mutual darkness here and at JA7NI's
QTH so the potential for interference should be nil in any case.
-- 
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1




On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Scott Tilley <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Warren and group
>
> Here's what JA7NI looked like here last night.  The attachment gives you a
> good idea of the BW he's using and his QRG.  Freq calibration is within a
> .01Hz...
>
> Have a look at the 153KHz link on my grabber for a rough idea of how the
> path looks from night to night.
>
> 73 Scott
> http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/
>
>
> Warren Ziegler wrote:
>>
>> Laurence,
>>
>>
>>  What freq is the JA on so I can stay clear of it?
>>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>