Re: LF: 137.5

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: 137.5
From:	Gary - G4WGT <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 1 Jul 2010 20:30:22 +0100
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=E+xNRAhJdCbPYTE2LbZiPh4asT0xOj4E1Imf4ZDOnVg=; b=mhCaheu/GEQLDsaHBIFfxS6D3KVK4Adw7Q8yhNw8WUEUc8AbL1w8Bb3KJO/WMTqjlY IrxvOpztoASqIZbeF2Uyo1SrVIysvP3xpOSvvIo/HOZM+tSFxwQvkunopiyCiW+wrf0C 2lgFBs9XjkNTbX6zbYLZaQZiOxfn1nAW3pzYw=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=pv7yhisUo1IHePvVOyZLAckIs3ZkAzWtavD4+eCsrsITPVcQHXeZ3CGm9yrJiARZdm hWWb3+TCnEq/B9oeZWA5xWWF2BabQVmyMo1L8eID/TljvUFYYUQI/4KxRZ7hycAiIh+D fTqf3/eqB+cBQAMzuNAc1/qaAwR45xEyvr93k=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<006101cb194f$261481a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
References:	<003101cb194a$28495540$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <006101cb194f$261481a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Mal,

Not instability of the equipment, my own error in not locking the dial & unfortunately touched it.

OK, I take your point about others may be curious about what it looks like but I believe that I am transmitting well within the terms of my licence & recommended bandwidths. Oh & by the way, my ERP is only 50mW approx.

Gary - G4WGT

On 1 July 2010 19:56, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:

You are now jumping about in frequency, instability.

Others not familiar with this transmission might want to see what it looks like and how much bandwidth it consumes.

g3kev

----- Original Message -----

From: Gary - G4WGT

To: [email protected]

Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:38 PM

Subject: Re: LF: 137.5

Mal,

Are there so many stations on the band that I am preventing someone else operating ?

I don't think 100Hz is uneconomical & I do know what it looks like.

Gary - G4WGT.

On 1 July 2010 19:20, mal hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:

Not economical frequency use.

see pic

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: 137.5, mal hamilton Re: LF: 137.5, Andy Talbot Re: LF: 137.5, mal hamilton Re: LF: 137.5, Gary - G4WGT Re: LF: 137.5, mal hamilton Re: LF: 137.5, Gary - G4WGT <= Re: LF: 137.5 Jumping in frequency, Graham

Previous by Date:	LF: RE: 137.500 kHz ROS MF-1 beacon, g3zjo
Next by Date:	Re: LF: RE: 137.500 kHz ROS MF-1 beacon, Gary - G4WGT
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: 137.5, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: 137.5 Jumping in frequency, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]