To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: Re: JA7NI |
From: | Scott Tilley <[email protected]> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:44:56 +0000 |
In-reply-to: | <004a01cb2c2b$011c2a30$0601a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <[email protected]> <4CDADF1C40094F0EBA72B3F8E6AAB847@MaynePC> <002001cb2c21$e68cc840$0601a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <[email protected]> <004a01cb2c2b$011c2a30$0601a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Mal Nicely rationalized. 73 Scott mal hamilton wrote: I am talking about small tx loops relative to frequency. A full size loop is a different story and I also use one on 160 metres at times. g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Tilley" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:46 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: JA7NIActually Mal he does use a loop on 160m. http://tgc.jp-au.net/tazawako_ja7ni.htm "To talk much and arrive nowhere is the same as climbing a tree to catch a fish." 73 Scott VE7TIL mal hamilton wrote:He has a large antenna also on 160 m and not a LOOP G3KEV |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Re: JA7NI, Rick Wakatori |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: Re: JA7NI, Laurence KL7UK |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: JA7NI, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: Re: JA7NI, Rick Wakatori |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |