To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Antenna Article |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:48:47 +0100 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1272466136; bh=HXxJ/LSbTGpE89X5QTzZE3IOy2R+fvB1AMv2zXsi6HI=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=nOaEP2R4mFDP6jGh5345L4r6BvmjG+4WrdBnDxcDFfzV9jaGDeh9jGy/neWlhgVFxfdOH5IBaQ1MFPax7VKa9qbRMBUUzwWLVBubNLYNfEK4UY+nbXKke4TanJ6H2fBUDE4AWl4KK8tQkeUNBTtpPBEKKECwSSryJ1T2KTZCTw0= |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=q8gH8moEwjUBT477w/A8+nvWbDfZO6cJplhCiPyQnQNSfUWDgb0osKuXI/91UeGhX5keY0SPOUBZY8TlfhXF8lfO4r1PsbDstUPI+Hryt8GMmsWQDeJ+9PWeMKqLwyfJNMsEbhbhz1NkURohIVI2QEXfxKCJGbocUxqwhbF1L98= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi JB there is something similar to this I believe in Rick's ON7YD's web tutorial on LF antennas. http://www.strobbe.eu/on7yd/136ant/ look at section 2.12 Is this a case of feeding at an elevated tapping point to get a better impedance.....very short antennas are very low in impedance at 160........you may find this doesnt work at LF (136 - 180) due to the much higher ground losses.....interesting experiment though. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Bruce McCreath" <[email protected]> To: "& UK) and MedFer bands Discussion of the Lowfer (US European" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:35 PM Subject: LF: Antenna Article Hello LFers & Lowfers, Volume 7 of the ARRL Antenna Compendium has an interesting article by John, VE2CV, on an electrically small antenna for 160 meters. He mentions how a virtual inductance can be created at the top of a tower by means of "insulating a suitable conductor inside the tower and shorting it to the tower at some judicious length away from the end." The top loading wires are attached to the top of this conductor which extends above the top of the tower by some distance. Has anyone here tried this very interesting approach? I don't recall hearing or reading of this method of putting an inductor at the top of a vertical section of a top loaded LF antenna. Being more of a mechanical nature rather than the usual elevated coil, its losses may be less. I might give it a try myself just to check it out. 73, J.B., VE3EAR LowFER Beacon "EAR" 188.830 kHz. QRSS30 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: : RN3AGC 28-04.jpg, henny van elst |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Test, Alan Melia |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Antenna Article, John Bruce McCreath |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: Antenna Article, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |