To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: about guns, water pistols and dripping tabs |
From: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:42:39 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <000b01ca9a1d$f538a620$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> |
References: | <[email protected]> <000b01ca9a1d$f538a620$0202a8c0@laptopcore2> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Eddie, Andy, Roger, all, the nice thing about WSPR and the www.wspr.org web site is that a lot af data is available. I copied the my spots (past 7 days) of G4JNT, G3XBM and G3ZJO from the web site and threw them in the mill to check how often I copied at least 2 of the 3 calls in the same time slot: I took only the night time spots as I assume that propagation then is 1 hop ionospheric and small differences in distance are less important. * G3XBM - G3ZJO: 6 'hits', average difference = 8dB (in favor of Roger) 6 data sets is a bit low to to proper statistics, but the difference of 8dB between Roger and Eddie fits well into the claimed ERP's (1mW and 200uW = 7dB) * G4JNT - G3XBM : 60 'hits', average difference = 15dB (in favor of Andy) 15dB difference would mean that if Roger's 1mW ERP is correct that Andy would run "only" 30mW ERP ? But the standard dev. is 6dB, so it could be (a more realistic) 120mW as well ... * G4JNT - G3ZJO: 6 'hits', average difference = 23dB (in favor of Andy) Nice, this is the sum of the previous values (as iit should be ;-) ) All values are give or take some dB, but they seem to make sense. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T At 23:14 20/01/2010, you wrote: Yeh ! Congratulations Roger. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: grabber at Twente WebSDR, Roman RW3ADB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: XGJ 21-01.jpg, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: G3ZJO_OK, John P-G |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: about guns, water pistols and dripping tabs, Roger Lapthorn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |