Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: about guns, water pistols and dripping tabs

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: about guns, water pistols and dripping tabs
From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:29:16 -0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=QEK+KFmbi5SxL7MnBZaMUYeX6nbFtByr9U2+t/XY0oyQmZoIRTZ6zrJ5OotZaao2a0g8q10QyseBbYErg2wR+HZcAlCdIxGQzGANqby8rxh8kSrYkJfCxCV2wAcqPnYkfwPKRoKbmdSodmbQt1PH4+zKG/ZO/ZktfwJcxc4/AHc= ;
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Dear Roger, LF Group,

I tried sending this earlier, but it does not appear to have got through...

--- On Thu, 21/1/10, Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]> wrote:
This is most interesting. I notice that M0BMU was running with 50mW ERP last night, so it might be worth plugging in his reports as well for last night. ...

Mea Culpa... I seem to have left the WSPR power indicated as 50mW from some 136kHz tests - in fact the 500kHz ERP from M0BMU was close to the normal 2W level last night.

Estimating transmitter ERP from received WSPR signal reports is prone to large inaccuracies, for at least 2 reasons: -You have to estimate the ground wave propagation loss, which depends on various "unknown factors" such as ground conductivity, terrain and so on, and for distances greater than a few 10s of km the uncertainty could easily be several dB or more. -To get received signal field strength from WSPR SNR, you have to assume a value for the noise field strength. Noise being noise, this is likely to have unpredictable variations of several dB too.

So the ERP estimated from the received signal is better than nothing, but at best is going to be an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a precise figure with well-defined error limits. Ground features usually lead to higher ground wave losses, and noise levels tend to increase rather than decrease, so these ERP estimates are likely to be on the low side. A much better estimate of ERP can be got by measuring antenna current and calculating radiation resistance from the antenna geometry - then the main source of error is the "site loss" due to environmental effects on the transmitting antenna. But this seems to be usually in the range 0 - say, 6dB for most locations, so as Andy says, if you assume -3dB you will probably be quite close.

Cheers, Jim Moritz
73 de M0BMU



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: LF: about guns, water pistols and dripping tabs, James Moritz <=