To: | "[email protected]" <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: WSPR BEACONS |
From: | Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:55:03 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <008801ca6a1b$d6a66210$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
References: | <008801ca6a1b$d6a66210$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2) |
at least if the "CW QSO operator" is willing to do so ... 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Quoting mal hamilton <[email protected]>: These unattended Beacons are often a source of QRM for the CW QSO operator, whereas a cw QSO operator in real time can qsy to take evasive action and avoid qrm to others on adjacent frequencies.G3KEV |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: WSPR a QSO mode not just beacon, James Cowburn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR a QSO mode not just beacon, Rik Strobbe |
Previous by Thread: | LF: WSPR BEACONS, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR BEACONS, Andy - KU4XR |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |