|
Andy,
Yes that would be a good idea as it
would increase the number of monitor stations , and as your system
is software defined you could simply qso inside
the '502.4' wspr window ... as the wspr system perhaps more
'sensitive' you could reduce power by say 10dB over the 120
second tx period to save 'your' system ?
I think there still may be an issue with the
wspr frequency interims of operations outside Europe on higher channels
which is a pity as it reduces the opportunities to monitor , with the
504 carrier presenting quite a strong signal, it's perhaps
not desirable to have it in the wspr pass band as it may (is) cause
false decodes , especially when 'modulation' is
present,
Thank you for running the beacon
over the year and Gary for setting up a perm ant monitoring
station with the results displayed on his web page, the saved text
data files will be available shortly, linked to the
beacon page on the uk500khz group and may be plotted on line.
Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 1:58 PM
Subject: LF: 'JNT Beacon off
From tomorrow (Monday 2009/09/07) my beacon on 503.7kHz will be off for a
few days pending various odd jobs around here. Hopefully it
should be back again next weekend.
As we approach the winter months, would it be worth modifying to add a WSPR
transmission as well? I don't want to stop the 15 minute timed
signal on 503.7 for auto logging, but it wouldn't be too difficult to add a
WSPR transmission between those, on a different frequency somewhere in the 503.8
to 504.0 range.
Andy www.g4jnt.comthis email has been scanned
for political correctness by the nanny state
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.78/2347 - Release
Date: 09/05/09 05:51:00
| 