Re: LF: G3LDO

[Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>]

Hi Roman, LF,

 

from my experience, I don't think that either SpecLab or Argo would generally be more sensitive than the other. If you use similar settings (eg. FFT resolution 0.34 Hz), then there is little difference in the appearance of the spectrograms. On the other hand, compared to Argo's predefined optimized settings, SpecLab has a lot of flexibility, allowing for example to trade in sensitivity for screen bandwidth.

 

Kind regards,

MArkus (DF6NM)

-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Roman RW3ADB <rw3adb@rambler.ru>
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Verschickt: Mi., 30. Sept. 2009, 0:41
Thema: LF: G3LDO

Hi Peter, LF! 
 
Looking to your freq too! 
qrss.nm.ru -> grabber 3 window 500-501.7 3rd window. But SPL... Is not so sensitive then ARGO. 
But I hope to see you. 
 
-- 
Roman RW3ADB.