Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: IC7200

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: IC7200
From: Warren Ziegler <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:27:39 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w6frPgNPW8PUm4kvLE0by5jfX+BE/J9AQ1tOLgX3TYA=; b=VSPuej1Kt4IgLcbrj73vBXEQqMQJfmCDWCOtOs03sJ7Q9dqsVh8GMeG5famjQ8LnMC MlW03PkV8Q4ngmKzdYp/MhWTAHhiVFIdJdkpMDuuFoZ301auQCDJYrQ+7PvQQS+vTQvK ugsTBOouEc9dFj105kc4RCMLI22bx2b7jv3FQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q1WTOLNeQfbf6ioOd8HSVgGxQZKJ8PyZDf7YDfNT0ovdOL/ZIXxl8J7msPrMq/jWxx h7ZR/dS7NmuqWNyCqzw+rFnxOdfD88U3n/zG7el6K2HTnSdoyne/gJrcOU+q7tSxxSk8 rVxmKHG+vDQ/b8fbwBWY0UJ3ByfayNzbwrUvs=
Domainkey-status: good (testing)
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
According to QST:

"Reduced receiver sensitivity below 500kHz
...

*Preamp off/on: 505 kHz, –121/–128 dBm; 137 kHz, –116/–95 dBm; 30 kHz,
–77/–66 dBm.
The preamp does not improve sensitivity below approximately 250 kHz."

-- 
73 Warren K2ORS
                WD2XGJ
                WD2XSH/23
                WE2XEB/2
                WE2XGR/1


On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Roelof Bakker<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am looking for information on the LF receiver performance of the new
> ICOM IC7200 transceiver. There seems to be a review in the June issue of
> QST.
> I don't have direct access to QST. Is there someone who has access to QST
> and can tell me if anything has been said about receiver sensitivity below
> 500 kHz?
>
> Even better is there someone on this list with first hands experience?
>
> Thank you in advance.
>
> Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>