Re: LF: test

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: test
From:	Dave Pick <[email protected]>
Date:	Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:31:13 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z7C/+84v5aeWgM58PC/9KK+PGjg+NJTXMB3PfABwMNs=; b=Cbr01X2hulobvL0PcaKz2BeyleVFpZDgW1Eqep7vmxKpHKe2Kntu3i2GnrywOuT7yD lzZdQzaa6f5kT0iTlW23vAh1w/zCqMwS8RY6nj01x7pL87/adzQyce+URBDZfG0ntJVb U9XTLm/F/ErI6Mq+ZhYWkr+cnJE5scPbbllcY=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Zdj7N/YyflFdDaMVpxmAkPlVvpT0p3xC9viQO/+8CdZzTkM2x0R/QuQQ7YaP4O6E2Q AzvpYUJIOnuk+8igXP775TjtPP8oI5uOYuOtnV6jv9wrJ4djhAiRjYhZyqAb1P0UiDOH /ij5fmzi42uda1nZLHzG77fshPnnF7h+RitPU=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Harry

Well at least it's easy with Googlemail, you can just "archive" it all
when you've scanned for anything interesting. Then its available for
searching through later. They give you so much storage you don't need
to delete anything!

Dave.

2009/3/10 Harry Woodhouse <[email protected]>:
> Dear Dave, Thanks for all your trouble.I have now got a Google Mail address,
> and joined with no problems, but am overwhelmed by the volume of it!!
>                             Regards, Harry
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Dave Pick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Here is the error message:
>>
>> Reporting-MTA: dns; ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure)
>> Remote-MTA: dns; [193.82.116.32]
>> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'This message
>> scored 5.3 spam points - rejected' (delivery attempts: 0)
>>
>> 2009/2/20 Dave Pick <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > My last message didn't get through... does this work?
>> > Was trying to help a colleague who was having trouble subscribing to
>> > this reflector, even though he was doing exactly the right thing his 
>> > message
>> > was being bounced by a spam filter. Is there any way round this?
>> >
>> > Dave.
>> >
>> > --
>> > G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK
>>
>
>



-- 
G3YXM IO92BK Birmingham UK

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: test, Harry Woodhouse Re: LF: test, Dave Pick <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: 184khz / 503.7 kHz, jcraig
Next by Date:	Re: LF: 184khz, jcraig
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: test, Harry Woodhouse
Next by Thread:	LF: 137KHz reports please, Harry Woodhouse
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]