To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: 600m es 60m |
From: | "John RABSON" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:39:00 +0200 |
In-reply-to: | <007001c91b4b$48b0c010$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
References: | <007001c91b4b$48b0c010$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
You lucky people! Here we have neither 600 nor 60 m. 73 John F5VLF *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 20/09/2008 at 19:04 mal hamilton wrote: >LF >While monitoring MF and waiting for some acty I just had a couple of QSO'S >on 60 m. This band is not over populated but there is some acty at times. >Heard some USA acty last night around 2230 utc. >73 Mal/g3kev |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Choice of RX for 136, John RABSON |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: 600m es 60m, mal hamilton |
Previous by Thread: | LF: 600m es 60m, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: 600m es 60m, mal hamilton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |