Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: Choice of RX for 136

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: Choice of RX for 136
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:25:35 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)

John,

a simple "Softrock style" front end adapted for 136 or 500kHz should work very well if you have a decent soundcard. There are a few SDR programs that works with such a front end, for example I2PHD's Winrad. Considering how narrow these bands are, there is no need for a VFO. Just use a crystal oscillator for LO and do the tuning in the software.

Perseus is indeed a very good receiver, and it is a lab' instrument as well. I will *never* regret buying that "appliance"! ;-)

The Perseus itself is very quiet but whenever a computer is involved in the receiving process, beware of the potential noise sources... Here is a horror story about my Dell laptop:

  http://web.telia.com/~u33233109/dellpsu/dellnoise.html

73 de Johan SM6LKM


John RABSON wrote:
My receiver for this band is a Lowe HF250 with a 2m x 2m loop (estimated 
effective height 8 m).  It received G3XIZ surprisingly well on Sunday even 
though the selectivity of the receiver leaves something to be desired and there 
is a crossmodulation problem with longwave broadcast.

I'm thinking of getting something better, such as an SDR (Perseus?). What do people think?
73
John F5VLF



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>