Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: 500khz rtty

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: 500khz rtty
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:06:16 +0200
In-reply-to: <002401c906de$82e26030$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
References: <000d01c9052d$6f142c30$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920><C6D17EC6BC594EC7A5CAAF551968B84E@AGB><003e01c90543$b12bb870$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920><[email protected]><005701c90555$0018bcb0$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920><9256A09B44B94949B34506B5E7260A84@AGB> <[email protected]> <002401c906de$82e26030$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.2)

Mal,

I am well aware of your large antenna and superb location.

But the nice thing about an ERP limit (at least for those with more humble antennas and locations, including me) is that one can compensate for lower radiation resistance and/or higher losses by increasing TX power. Even near field absorbsion can be compensated by increasing power. This is true for both 137kHz and 502kHz. On 137kHz the power needed to get 1 W ERP with a small antenna is often in excess of a few kW, so not very realistic (also because of the hight RF voltages). But on 502kHz even with a small antenna a few 100 W should do the job. Very realistic for most.

73, Rik  ON7YD


Quoting mal hamilton <[email protected]>:

Rik
My advantage is Location. I am only  2 miles from the sea to the East
across countryside, to my south there is a river, which probably helps
and I am sorrounded by thousands of hectares of green fields in all the
other directions. The only obstacle if any is the town of Scarborough
to my SE.
Therefore, my transmitted signal has a good take off and the same
applies on receive. I have maximum advantage with the permitted power.
Measuring or comparing signals at a distance is impossible, it depends
how the signal is launched, in an urban environment/middle of a housing
estate the signal is likely to be attenuated dramatically.
Air calibration at various distances from the TX is the only reliable
solution. Hardly worth the effort.
The German beacons on 505 khz are strong with me during daytime as well
as night time, and as a matter of interest I can work most EU stations
on 160 metres daytime when they are active. Antenna on 160 is a one
wave inv L at over 100 ft vertical, this is one leg of 4 legs for 137
khz.
de G3KEV


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:33 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 500khz rtty


Based on the antenna description given by Mal ("1/4 wave inv L for 500
khz, 100 ft vertical and rest horizontal") simulation reveals a
radiation resistance of 5 Ohm and a directivity of 1.5 dBd. This means
that only 375 mA antenna current is needed to radiate 1 W ERP.
It is hard to tell from here, but such a big antenna should have a
loss resistance of 20 Ohm or less. So in the worst case 2.8 Watt TX
power is needed to get 1 Watt ERP.

I can only dream of such a situation ;-)

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:18 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 500khz rtty


ANYTIME . If you saw the fet in my PA you would'nt bother.
G3KEV

----- Original Message ----- From: "John Pumford-Green GM4SLV" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 500khz rtty


On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:14:23 +0100
"mal hamilton" <[email protected]> wrote:

I thought that would be the response from you. Why no ID?
I will let OFCOM decide if necessary
G3KEV

Perhaps we could ask them to check your ERP at the same time?



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.6/1626 - Release Date: 8/21/2008 6:54 PM







No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1628 - Release Date: 8/22/2008 18:32






Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1629 - Release Date:
8/23/2008 1:16 PM



Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>