To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | LF: Re: Litz wire |
From: | "Alan Melia" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:00:22 -0000 |
Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=Qikka4LBWvZnhUgLBqdLCP8v+LJi+L0n+3AohmM6QheegIqklKQv13qNomk0QlajuHI8MiUzF6VNhjU9hPQDan4nBlXxBccIlYDks55k0RJZDMMG0II0aXgyZ2X8Xtxl86VmSkVCYQorqQ6leV8FzGagKu8uzF2GBxU0ubTbFUU= ; |
Domainkey-status: | good (testing) |
References: | <001e01c86bd7$38723a90$0301a8c0@ken> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hi Ken I may be wrong but I think this is a bundled stranded (insulated?) wire, not proper "litz" which is always laid in powers of 3, viz 81, 243, etc this is to ensure that each strand weaves from the centre of "bundle" to the outside and back again. It will be better than solid no doubt, but is a cheaper version. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Wright" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:22 AM Subject: LF: Litz wire > Hi every one. > > Just seen on e-bay a 4.35Kg reel of 130 x 0.125 Litz wire e-bay number > 160207115620, there are a further 4 reels available. > > > > 73's Ken M0KHW IO91TV > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: Litz wire, Ken Wright |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Re: Swl report 10-Feb-08 part 2, henny van elst |
Previous by Thread: | LF: Litz wire, Ken Wright |
Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Re: Litz wire, Ken Wright |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |