Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon

from [John Andrews] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon
From: John Andrews <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:07:12 +0000
In-reply-to: <001301c85e05$38a2cd20$681c7ad5@w4o8m9>
References: <003601c85bb2$ced17940$0100007f@w4o8m9> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <003701c85c7b$68b9d0c0$99188351@w4o8m9> <000b01c85d35$c99fc4c0$c02a8351@w4o8m9> <000f01c85d41$79d94a40$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <003501c85db7$61301ac0$f7327ad5@w4o8m9> <001301c85e05$38a2cd20$681c7ad5@w4o8m9>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) 

Jim,
JT2, like WOLF, is heavily error-corrected, which seems to be a good thing for weak signal performance at this frequency. JASON is reasonably robust, but with no forward error correction, would be in a much lower category. Take a look at: 
http://www.w1tag.com/600M_Modes.htm
for some thoughts on what Jay and I have been playing with over here. The bandwidths of some of the modes may strain the rules of propriety -- your call.
If you want to try JT2, I can furnish some hints that worked well at the TX and RX ends in our tests. 

John Andrews, W1TAG


DD7PC has suggested JT2, which I don't know much about
yet, and I2PHD's "Jason" also seems like a good candidate. Any other
suggestions or comments?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon, Jean-Pierre Méré
Next by Date:  LF: Re: XGR/3 WOLF Tonight, J. B. Weazle McCreath
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon, Jean-Pierre Méré
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: M0BMU WOLF beacon, chastant
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]