Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | [email protected] |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LF: Re: 503.5kHz WOLF test |
| From: | Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:28:07 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <00db01c8589b$e9882cd0$0d00000a@AGB> |
| References: | <[email protected]> <9308C66C28ED44C3A2360F7AEBCC7829@WarrenPC> <004801c857b0$225b79a0$0d00000a@AGB> <008801c857c3$d1ee1720$0d00000a@AGB> <001601c857c8$d5699000$e22a8351@w4o8m9> <00b201c857ce$b01dc680$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <003801c85844$0da9c770$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <00a301c8586f$9f8b9bc0$0d00000a@AGB> <[email protected]> <00db01c8589b$e9882cd0$0d00000a@AGB> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
Hello Gary, Graham, and the group,Thanks for testing the new WOLF GUI with the soundcard selector - glad to hear it works since I couldn't test it myself. At my home QTH I have an enormous unstable carrier just above 500 kHz, about 6 kHz wide with a hum-like sound. It wipes everything out except some DI beacons. Marco - Indeed KK7KA's WOLF decodes signals which are *much* weaker than those you can see on a waterfall display. So the waterfall is not a good tuning aid for WOLF signals; but it helps to check if a receiver is connected at all. Cheers, Wolf DL4YHF . |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 500KHz test, David Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: LF: 500KHz test G4WGT and G0MRF, Graham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 503.5kHz WOLF test, Graham |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: Re: 503.5kHz WOLF test, James Moritz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |