Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: A bit of light reading

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: A bit of light reading
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:56:20 +0100
In-reply-to: <[email protected] m>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
At 12:58 15/11/2007, you wrote:
http://www.scrbg.org/g4jnt/NewLaws.htm

Andy,

The value for the speed of light must be raised.
Yes, because increasing the speed ten times would
- let us get rid the annoying time delay in EME QSO's
- reduce the radioactive waste volume in nuclear power plants by 99%
No, because increasing the speed of light to 3x10exp10 m/s would
- increase the wavelength at any given frequency by a factor 100 (and thus we would need 100 times larger antennas)
Of course this last can be compensated by your other suggestion to lower the impedance of free space.

Thermal noise will be reduced in stages over several years.
Simplest way to do this is by reducing the Boltzmann constant. Instead of making it variable I would just make it 0 to get rid of any thermal noise.

73, Rik ON7YD

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>