Re: LF: A bit of light reading

[Rik Strobbe <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be>]

At 12:58 15/11/2007, you wrote:
> http://www.scrbg.org/g4jnt/NewLaws.htm

Andy,

The value for the speed of light must be
raised.
Yes, because increasing the speed ten times would
- let us get rid the annoying time delay in EME QSO's
- reduce the radioactive waste volume in nuclear power plants by 99%
No, because increasing the speed of light to 3x10exp10 m/s would
- increase the wavelength at any given frequency by a factor 100 (and
thus we would need 100 times larger antennas)
Of course this last can be compensated by your other suggestion to lower
the impedance of free space.

Thermal noise will be reduced in stages over
several years.
Simplest way to do this is by reducing the Boltzmann constant.
Instead of making it variable I would just make it 0 to get rid of any
thermal noise.

73, Rik ON7YD

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information.