Return to KLUBNL.PL main page
| To: | <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Re: RE: 600 V 160 |
| From: | "hamilton mal" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:44:14 -0000 |
| Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
| Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
| References: | <000201c7e013$1a798340$0b01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | [email protected] |
John, Yes same erp. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John W Gould" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:38 PM Subject: LF: RE: 600 V 160 > Mal et al, it will be an interesting comparison, but it will be the ERP > (estimated or otherwise) that will be important, as well as some absolute > measurement of the noise floor on each band. > > Incidentally, has anyone done some noise floor measurements on 136kHz now > that the Rugby LORAN has gone? > > 73 John, G3WKL > > > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: Re: Re: 600 V 160, hamilton mal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: Re: 137.700, dl2hre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: RE: 600 V 160, Dave Sergeant |
| Next by Thread: | LF: Re: 600 V 160, Graham |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |